Screening Tech

Common Mammogram Findings – Moose and Doc

There are about eight typical sorts of abnormalities that a typical or diagnostic mammography might present. 

An skilled radiologist is very tuned to the looks of breast abnormalities in diagnostic imaging.  That is why, more often than not, the radiologist has a reasonably good concept whether or not a suspicious abnormality is more likely to be malignant or not.

Typical mammogram findings from breast most cancers screening


  • Uneven Breast Tissue
  • Uneven Density
  • Architectural Distortion Mass
  • Microcalcifications
  • Interval Modifications compared to earlier movies
  • Adenopathy
  • Different Miscellaneous Findings



What the hell, Doc! I’m taking a look at asymmetrical tissue and I feel you simply talked about most cancers.

Dr. HallsDr. Halls

Oh oh. I didn’t imply to try this. Learn under for reassurance that breast abnormalities often develop into benign.


Irregular Mammogram Findings: The Subsequent Step

Often, irregular mammogram findings would require some type of call-back or follow-up.

Comply with up often includes further imaging research, resembling breast ultrasound or breast MRI. Nevertheless, if the lesion nonetheless seems suspicious, a breast biopsy could also be vital.

Only a heads up, we’ve got a model new web page with updated info on irregular mammograms.


Asymmetrical breast tissue

Asymmetrical breast tissue is in respect to the identical space on the other breast. So, principally when the identical space of the breasts are in contrast there’s a distinction in breast tissue.

However, don’t fear, this can be a pretty obscure discovering by which there isn’t a focal mass, no distorted structure, no central density and no related breast calcifications.

Often about Three% of breast screening mammograms will present uneven breast tissue.

Moreover, solely a really small proportion of girls with asymmetrical breast tissue will find yourself truly having a breast biopsy. Sometimes, a breast most cancers analysis will solely be given to a really small proportion of girls with asymmetrical breast tissue.

An uneven density mammogram result’s solely a priority if there are associations with a clinically palpable abnormality, or a palpable mass. In any other case, a specific amount of asymmetrical breast tissue is a traditional variation that happens in some ladies.

In some instances, nevertheless, the asymmetrical breast density is Pseudo-Angiomatous Stromal Hyperplasia, however this situation is usually benign.

Uneven density

An asymmetrical density mammogram when it comes to the primary mammographic discovering often refers to an ‘opacity‘ (obscured view in a part of the breast) which is seen on just one projection (or one ‘view or angle‘ of the X-ray).

Sometimes, the radiologist will request further views from different X-ray angles as an instantaneous comply with up.

mammogram findingsUneven densities might be the results of different benign causes similar to:-

  • Submit surgical scarring
  • A easy cyst
  • Fibrosis
  • Sclerosing Adenosis
  • Focal fibroglandular tissue progress: which will develop because of hormone supplementation

Nevertheless ductal or lobular breast carcinoma may also trigger uneven breast tissue density.

Within the absence of an precise ‘mass‘, breast most cancers is sort of unlikely, however follow-up imaging is important, so don’t give up having mammograms.

Typically, an ultrasound would be the subsequent step, and if ultrasound finds nothing, or finds cysts, that’s excellent news. If ultrasound finds a strong irregular mass, then a biopsy is important.



Maintain on. Is there a distinction between asymmetrical breast tissue and asymmetrical density?

Dr. HallsDr. Halls

Darn. I assume that’s complicated. When the radiologist sees density on the mammogram, he/she won’t be capable of distinguish between ‘regular breast tissue’ and different issues which is perhaps cysts, nodules and even most cancers.


Mammogram Findings: Uneven breasts

And now … for one thing utterly totally different, nothing to do with most cancers. Do you know that it’s common for a lady’s breasts to be asymmetrical in a mirror?



Let’s imagine, my left breast is smaller than my proper. Suppose you noticed an image of them and I ask on your opinion?

Dr. HallsDr. Halls

I might say that it’s completely regular. It’s modifications in breast measurement and shapes that I might have considerations about.


Mammogram Findings: Architectural distortion

An architectural distortion on a mammogram is principally a disruption of the traditional ‘random‘ sample of curvilinear and fantastic linear radiopaque buildings usually seen on a breast X-ray.

There isn’t a seen mass, however the distortion typically seems as a ‘stellate‘ form or with radiating speculations.

Sufferers who’ve architectural distortion on mammography usually tend to have constructive margins than sufferers with plenty or calcifications.

This can be as a result of architectural distortion on mammography is mostly resulting from benign circumstances, inflicting the surgeon to excise with minimal margins.

mammogram findingsTumors presenting as architectural distortions on mammography are additionally considerably bigger than tumors presenting with different mammographic abnormalities.

Sufferers present process biopsy for non-palpable architectural distortions could have wider excisions to scale back the danger of constructive margins.

Specialists estimate that round four% of girls who undertake a screening mammogram current with an architectural distortion. The variety of these ladies during which the architectural distortion would truly symbolize invasive breast most cancers could be very low, maybe 5%-7% of the four% with architectural distortion, which turns into a really small quantity.



You do the maths.


How lengthy have been you ready to say that?
lol, you by no means do math. It’s zero.05 x zero.04 which provides zero.2%


Mammogram Findings: Architectural Distortion and Cancers

Clearly, most architectural distortions on mammography are on account of benign causes.

Consequently, most biopsies of suspicious architectural distortions are typically just a little bit on the small aspect. However within the occasion it did characterize invasive breast most cancers, it is very important excise the lesion with wider margins.

Architectural distortions typically are an accompanying function of breast most cancers plenty as nicely. Virtually 80% of breast plenty have architectural distortions that turn into invasive cancers, reminiscent of, invasive lobular carcinoma or invasive ductal carcinoma.

Mammographically detected breast mass


Dr. Halls

At a sure level, the radiologist deciphering the mammogram will name a suspicious function an precise ‘mass‘.

A breast mass is a ‘space-occupying‘ lesion seen on at the least two projections or ‘viewpoints‘(CC and MLO view).

Moreover, most breast plenty on mammogram are likely to have curved, convex borders. The radiologist will then describe the mass itself in accordance with three options:-

  • The form or contour
  • The margin
  • The density

mammogram findings
The mammographic picture under exhibits a small nodule with suspicious vague margins, probably invasive ductal carcinoma.

The phrase nodule is a time period specialists use to explain a small mass. The phrase lump (as in breast lump) refers to one thing an individual feels with their fingers.

Traits of mass form, margin and density, can recommend malignancy

When it comes to form, whether it is spherical, oval or barely lobular, the mass might be benign.

However, if the mass has a multi-lobular contour, or an irregular form, then it’s suggestive of malignancy. ‘Margin‘ seek advice from the traits of the borders of the mass picture.

When the margin is circumscribed and well-defined the mass might be benign. If the margin is obscured by greater than 75% by adjoining tissue, it’s reasonably suspicious of malignancy.

Likewise, there’s average suspicion if the margin is microlobulated ( i.e. having many small lobes ). If the margin is vague or spiculated (consisting of many small ‘needle-like‘ sections) then there’s additionally excessive suspicion of malignancy.

‘Density‘ is often categorised as both fatty, low, iso-dense or excessive. The mass might be benign for fatty and low densities, reasonably suspicious of malignancy for an iso-density and extremely suspicious of malignancy at excessive densities. The mammographic traits of breast plenty is sort of a posh and detailed research.

Mammogram Findings: Microcalcifications

mammogram findingsMicrocalcifications are one of many foremost methods radiologists detect breast most cancers on mammogram within the very early levels (Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).

Microcalcifications are literally tiny specks of mineral deposits (reminiscent of calcium). They distribute themselves in numerous methods. Typically microcalcifications are discovered scattered all through the breast tissue, they usually typically happen in clusters.

More often than not, microcalcification deposits are as a result of benign causes. Nevertheless, sure options and shows of microcalcifications usually tend to be related to malignant breast most cancers.

Benign and malignant indicators for microcalcifications


Benign/in all probability benign suspicious/malignant
Morphology Popcorn egg shell with a dense middle x (adenofibroma)
curvilinear egg shell with a transparent middle x (calcified cyst,


intra and peri-ductal bilateral x (secretory illness)
smudgy on CC and fluid degree on lateral x (milk of calcium)
powderish/BIRADS: amourphous,indistint x
crushed stone/BIRADS: pleomorphic, heterogeneous x
casting/BIRADS:linear, branching x
Distribution diffuse, scattered x
regional x
segmental/inside a serious system, wedge formed, nipple oriented x
clustered/often grouped in lower than 2 cubic centimetres x
linear, branching inside the galactophores x
Density homogeneous x
heterogenous x
Measurement and quantity measurement in mm x ( >1 ) x ( < zero.2 to 1 )
quantity per cubic centimetre x ( < Three.5 ) x ( > Three-5 )

When microcalcifications are encountered on a mammogram, figuring out that Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is widespread, the probabilities are good that it could possibly be DCIS and fewer more likely to be invasive most cancers. All of it is determined by what the precise microcalcifications appear to be and the way in depth they’re, some might seem as ‘suspicious calcifications’.



What % of microcalcifications are cancerous?

Dr. HallsDr. Halls

The statistics under are a bit of complicated, so let me simplify first. About 50% of the time that ‘clustered microcalcifications‘ are current, it seems to be one thing needing remedy like DCIS or most cancers. However ‘scattered microcalcifications‘ are ignorable.


In order that’s a tip.. search for the phrase cluster


Mammogram Findings: Forms of Microcalcifications

If the microcalcifications are ‘Powderish‘, with both a nice, indescernible, or ‘cotton ball‘ look, then the chance of DCIS is about 47% and most regularly leads to a ‘low-grade‘ most cancers.

When the microcalcifications have the ‘Crushed Stone‘ attribute, showing both as coarse, granular, angular, broken-needle-tip, arrowhead, or a spearhead form, then the chance of DCIS is about 61%. A breast most cancers categorized as low to intermediate-grade. But when the microcalcifications have a ‘Casting‘ look, then the chance of DCIS is about 96%, the breast most cancers is assessed as high-grade.

Casting microcalcifications sometimes seem in two variations. Variant A is known as ‘dense casting‘, with linear and branched, fragmented or irregular options. Variant B is known as ‘dotted casting‘, with granular and branched, dotted or snakeskin-like options.

Notice, whereas DCIS is usually thought-about a milder breast abnormality, it have to be confused that not all types of DCIS with microcalcifications are extremely curable.

There’s a new line of scientific proof which identifies a extremely aggressive-invasive subtype of casting microcalcification within the micropapillary DCIS subtype, which has a poor prognosis and ought to be handled with mastectomy.

The relative ratio between the carbonate content material and the protein matrix inside the microcalcification can also have some relationship to the kind of grade of ductal carcinoma related to them.


Dr. HallsDr. Halls

If the mammogram report doesn’t use the phrases ‘cluster of suspicious microcalcifications‘, the necessity for a biopsy is unlikely.


Mammogram Findings: A fast Q and A Session


  • Why do microcalcifications type? When gunk will get caught in blocked milk ducts, over time it will get exhausting and binds calcium.
  • How harmful are microcalcifications? They aren’t the damaging factor. It’s no matter blocked the ducts. So rephrasing…
  • How harmful is a most cancers with a cluster of microcalcifications? The most cancers is judged by itself options, and the microcalcifications haven’t any added hazard.
  • How dangerous are scattered microcalifications? By no means.


Interval Modifications

An ‘interval change‘ is just a notable distinction on a second or third scan compared to a earlier scan.

Sometimes there could also be modifications in measurement, density and contour of the mass, or modifications in measurement, quantity, configuration and sample of microcalcifications. A change within the dense tissue or contour of a mass is a reasonably particular signal of malignancy. Nevertheless, modifications within the sample of microcalcifications is considered a much less dependable indicator of malignancy.

Interval change is perhaps one space the place a pc aided detection system can help in breast most cancers identification, however an skilled radiologist is certain to be suspicious of any interval modifications on mammograms. (The ‘screening interval‘ is the really helpful period of time between ongoing breast most cancers screenings, often 1 to 2 years.)


Adenopathy refers to a discovering of enlargement of the lymph glands. A really small proportion of girls present process a breast most cancers screening mammogram will current with these options. (In some instances the mammogram detects enlarged axillary lymph nodes, however no breast mass. Typically the trigger is an ‘occult‘ main breast most cancers, both obscured from view or newly developed in a special area of the breast (or within the reverse breast.)

An axillary lymph node that appears enlarged on a mammogram might include most cancers, however some lymph nodes may be fairly giant usually.

Nevertheless, mammographical options of benign and malignant lymphadenopathy are very often indistinguishable. Typically the presence of intranodal calcifications (nodular density), or irregular lymph nodes on imaging, could be extra suggestive of malignancy as nicely.

As a rule of thumb, an axillary lymph node is suspicious if its measurement is bigger than 2 cm and with no fatty hilum.

Extra precicely, when a lymph node has a fatty hilum seen, the outer cortex must be 5 millimeters thick at most, however is often much less. When the cortex is 6 mm or thicker, the probabilities that a most cancers has unfold into the lymph nodes are vital. If there isn’t any fatty hilum seen, then your complete lymph node measured throughout its smallest short-axis width, must be no bigger than 10 millimeters.

Ultrasound is usually helpful as a follow-up when enlarged lymph glands are detected. A few of these will probably be referred for both a nice needle or excisional biopsy. Typically a suspected enlarged lymph node seems to be both a lipoma, fibroadenoma, or a haematoma.

Widespread Causes of Enlarged Lymph Nodes

Widespread benign causes of benign lymphadenopathy may additionally embrace reactive nodal hyperplasia, or collagen vascular illness. An acute bacterial an infection or tuberculosis may additionally convey concerning the situation.

If the lymphadenopathy is definitely brought on by a malignant carcinoma, it’s typically related to breast most cancers improvement within the beforehand unaffected breast.

Miscellaneous abnormalities

Different findings of notice on a screening mammogram may embrace a discovering of inflammatory breast most cancers, or probably diffuse reticular breast density, and in addition pores and skin thickening.

We hope that this submit will assist once you obtain any radiology report relating to breast imaging and findings.

Lets do a fast Q & A’s


  • What about if ultrasound exhibits a hypoechoic focus or a breast mass? It’s principally the identical concern and the strategy to the answer includes comparable algorithms to a mammographic mass. Take a look at the margins, form and measurement and determine if it wants a biopsy and later perhaps excision or removing.
  • How typically are there no signs? Very often. And conversely, whether or not or not a lump is palpable or hurts, it doesn’t actually change the statistics or the workup.
  • What’s an incomplete mammogram outcome? Should you get an ‘incomplete mammogram’ report attempt to not fear. It means that there’s a potential abnormality however it couldn’t be clearly seen and additional investigations could also be crucial. This occurs in loads of ladies’s well being screening centres and is usually a results of having dense breast tissue making a diagnostic mammogram or ultrasound rather more troublesome to learn.

This will additionally recommend that the mammogram ought to be in contrast with older ones to see if there have been modifications within the space over time.




Extra references for this part are on this web page.

Again to Mammography record OR our new breast most cancers website OR our newest Breast Most cancers Incidence and Survival charges


fbq(‘init’, ‘919660061435205’);
fbq(‘monitor’, “PageView”);

About the author